HomeEITHER/ORFour Separate Weeks / One Full Month

Comments

Four Separate Weeks / One Full Month — 4 Comments

  1. I would choose option #1. I would of course go back to Italy and go to as many of my favorite places as will work in a one month trip (since there are no restrictions on train travel).
    The main reason I would not choose #2 is because I hate to fly. Four flights to Italy in one year (because I would still want to spend a month there) sounds like a nightmare.

  2. I choose option 2. It allows you to experience 4 different places, you can choose the best season to go there, you can check off 4 places from the bucket list, and perhaps choose different people to share the experience with. One consecutive month has limitations to one general region, ex; New Zealand AND Ireland is not possible. While staying a month in my favorite location is nice, I want options.

  3. I tend to choose option #1. I’d have time to get used to the differing time zones, really get into the place I am visiting.
    Plus like Girasoli, since I am not a big fan of flying, and can’t afford the luxury of First Class, I will only have to endure the Coach flight one round trip a year… which is probably what I can afford on a teacher budget. LOL

  4. Option 2 is the way to go for me. As of yet, I do not have a favorite place. Going to four different locations seems like more fun. It also give me more variety for “Remember the last year we traveled” stories.